Difference between revisions of "User talk:Qmeng"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Are you sure the place you pinned has the only antenna that is associated with that eNB? I'm afraid based on the coverage map it does not look like what you said. --[[User:Qmeng|Qmeng]] ([[User talk:Qmeng|talk]]) 22:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | : Are you sure the place you pinned has the only antenna that is associated with that eNB? I'm afraid based on the coverage map it does not look like what you said. --[[User:Qmeng|Qmeng]] ([[User talk:Qmeng|talk]]) 22:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
: I know the small cell is there, no need to tell me this. The problem is cell 12 which was found very close to eNB 109163. I haven't checked Trellis Ln but I'm pretty sure another small cell was built in that area, but not the rooftop you pinned. The other one shared the same eNB across multiple wood area, it is inappropriate to pin that eNB on the rooftop, because that is not the only place this eNB exists. --[[User:Qmeng|Qmeng]] ([[User talk:Qmeng|talk]]) 23:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:04, 18 July 2021
LEAVE THE SMALL CELL ALONE. I HAVE PROOF FROM THE COUNTY WHERE THE SMALL CELL IS.
- Are you sure the place you pinned has the only antenna that is associated with that eNB? I'm afraid based on the coverage map it does not look like what you said. --Qmeng (talk) 22:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
- I know the small cell is there, no need to tell me this. The problem is cell 12 which was found very close to eNB 109163. I haven't checked Trellis Ln but I'm pretty sure another small cell was built in that area, but not the rooftop you pinned. The other one shared the same eNB across multiple wood area, it is inappropriate to pin that eNB on the rooftop, because that is not the only place this eNB exists. --Qmeng (talk) 23:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)